Father, a man frozen in time
On average during class we tend to focus on the broad ideas of our assigned readings. We focus on CoalHouse Walker Jr. and his tensions surrounding civil rights, we go deep into how Mother takes responsibility in the absence of her husband, and we talk about all of the historically accurate and possibly inaccurate events of real life people. But there is one important character that, behind the scenes of our discussion, shapes the book in many ways. And perhaps you can look at it as this character provides contrast between post-modernist and the traditional 1900s. This blog post is about Father, possibly the most reactive, and dramatic character in the entire book. As you know, Father is married to mother, they have a son, they live with Mothers Younger Brother and Grandfather. Eventually their house is graced with a baby and Sarah, who faces a life changing tragedy..., and then CoalHouse who is the sole reason change happens in the family. But i'm not focusing on change within Father, i'm focusing on the absence on change.
When Father leaves for the Peary expedition Mother is living in the house with the boy, and the Grandfather. Sometimes Mother's Younger Brother is present. We get a sense that Mother and Father's marriage, on the surface, is content. However, there is a sense that below that surface it's not the most stable. We get this idea when the narrator explains that, "the marriage seemed to flourish on Father's extended absences." (Doctorow 11). Suggesting that the couples marriage is more stagnant. Mother sees their time alone as formal, and dutiful instead of intimate. Ironically, Father is oblivious that their marriage is 'formal,' we see this later in the book when Mother is being noticed by other men in Atlantic City, "Father was oblivious to the man's spectacle notice of his wife. Mother was amused by this." (Doctorow 252). To wrap up this idea, Father is leaving a simple house where his relationship is good, to his analysis, and there are two sometimes three other people in the house.
After Father's return home a few tiny things have changed... Mother is now taking care of a black baby, and the mother of that child, Sarah, is hiding in his house. On top of that, Mother has taken all the responsibilities of the house, even reading Emma Goldman books. She has gone from a woman who relied on her husband, to an independent head of the house, starting by saying, "I will take the responsibility [of the child]." (Doctorow 70-71). Additionally his son had become smarter, and taller. Father felt "childlike" next to his own child. (Doctorow 112). "He wandered through the house finding everywhere signs of his own exclusion." (Doctorow 110). Father feels excluded in the families advancements while he was absent. He didn't even recognize himself. However, although his physical appearance has changed, his mental and psychological aspects hadn't changed. While he was home he made note about how different everything was in his household now. "He felt passed by life." (Doctorow 216)
To add onto Father's slowing crumbling hold on his masculinity in the family, CoalHouse Walker Jr. enters the story. This black man drives up in his new fancy Model T. Ford, shows up every week in hopes of courting Sarah, and ultimately uproots Fathers life. This is where we see Father's fragile masculinity starting to show, he even resorts to shaming C.H.W for "not [knowing] he was a Negro." (Doctorow 162). He goes so far to say that "there is something reckless about [C.H.]. Even Matthew Henson knows his place." (Doctorow 162). I think that in that moment Father is intimidated, Mother even has to calm him down from his dramatics. At times, she calmly places her hand over top of his to silence him, "Ill call the police, he said," after C.H.'s visits became often, "Mother laid a hand on his arm." (Doctorow 157). We see Mother then becoming the head of the house while Father is catching up with societies new eras.
To close, I think that it is immensely important to focus on characters that aren't always the main event of the chapter, because it adds context when you hone in on one character. The contrast with Mother and Father provides us a contrast between modernist or the early 1900s and post-modernist. Mother is reading Emma Goldman, while Father gets back from an expedition that screams the early 1900s. When Father takes his son to a ball game he is astonished by how different baseball his compared to Harvard 20 years ago. By the end of the book we can kind of assume that Father's mental aspects had changed, he starts to help the policemen in their pursuit of CoalHouse Walker. We aren't given a clear explanation other than Father confessing that he felt safer in the Police station, even coming to the rude conclusion that he actually didn't hate CoalHouse because of his skin color but rather by his anger towards the death of his wife. Father embodies the resistance of societal change, and the complex journey of ones "catching up" in a world that is forever transforming.
- Zoe Parker
Works:
Doctorow, E. L. Ragtime. Random House, 2007 .

Hey Zoe! Super cool blog. I never really thought about Father from this perspective. I just automatically assumed that he left, he changed, he came back, end of the story. But it's really a lot more complicated than that. When he comes back so much has seemingly changed but in REALITY it's not him. The WORLD is changing, in his household, gender norms are changing, and even racial ideas are being challenged (by coalhouse's group). Times are changing and in the end, when he is doing all of this stuff with like weapon plans I think? His boat (ironically) gets shot down by a German U-Boat which could symbolize the worlds shift into a state of war.
ReplyDeleteHi Zoe, I agree with your view on Father's lack of change. I like all the evidence you presented. I think you could also say how given Father's background as coming from Harvard and running a successful fireworks company, people would assume that he should be quick to new ideas and opportunities. However, we kind of see the opposite here. Like you said, as Father struggles to comprehend the new ideas, he exemplifies someone stuck in the past.
ReplyDeleteHello Zoe, The way I see father is that history is happening around him, but he does not react. He is the ultimate 'just a character in a story'. When he goes on an expedition to the north pole, he doesn't actually get the 'top' of the earth due to weakness. He is apart of the start of US involvement in WW1, but he does not himself get involved (due to his death of course). He is just an ordinary person that finds himself in history.
ReplyDeleteHi Zoe! I agree with the contrast you make between Mother's development, and Father's lack thereof. I also think this contrast ties into the end of the book, when Mother eventually begins her relationship with Tateh. While Father refused to change, Tateh constantly tried to better himself throughout the course of the novel, whether that be by moving himself and his daughter to a new city, in search of better opportunities, or finding a niche that he was finally able to profit off of. Either way, Tateh certainly progressed, as did Mother, while Father was figuratively and literally left behind. In this sense, it made for a good conclusion that Mother would end up with Tateh, a man whose characteristics were more on par with Mother's. Great blog!
ReplyDeleteIt's true that Father's character forms a consistent "throughline" in this novel--he's mentioned in the opening sentence, and he plays a surprisingly key role late in the narrative with negotiations around the Coalhouse occupation. He actually does have his own narrative "arc" that's a little harder to see at times: by the end of the novel, he's advising the State's Attorney of New York on the political implications of his negotiations, and he's last seen starting a second career as an illegal arms dealer for the war effort.
ReplyDeleteBut as you note, the overwhelming sense of Father's character in the novel is "reactive"--things are changing all around him, and he doesn't like it. Coalhouse pushes this reaction the furthest, since this "story" happens to enter Father's actual HOME, and he can't help but deal with the issues it raises. We get the sense that Father would really prefer not to have to have an opinion on Coalhouse and his "rebellion" at all--he would like to be just one of the many anonymous white people in New Rochelle whose views are reflected in the newspaper editorials. But the novel, using Coalhouse as a catalyst, *forces* Father to take a position, and we get this fascinating showdown between him and Younger Brother: if Father is "frozen in time," a nineteenth-century relic trying to survive in the modern world, then MYB is maybe in some ways "ahead of his time," as Father seems totally baffled that a man in MYB's position would be willing to sacrifice his privilege in order to throw in with a revolutionary cause.
I agree with all of this. It's almost like Father and the characters around him are a shrunken-down reflection of the seismic changes taking place in the world of the book (and, really, our world at the time as well.) The characters around him are going out shattering gender and race roles, joining revolutions and growing up while he, the curmudgeonly old man he seems to be at times, plugs his ears, covers his eyes, and continues in vain to attempt to live in his vision of a bygone era. Of course, by the end of the book, he does start to "come around" to this new world, but by then he's too late - his illegal weapons in the hold of the Lusitania ironically hasten his death when it's torpedoed by a German submarine. And only a year after his death, Mother remarries to Tateh, a man who symbolizes almost the exact opposite approach to change as Father did. The way you connect these contrasting approaches to change to the contrast between modern and postmodern ideas in your conclusion is very interesting as well.
ReplyDeleteHi Zoe! I really enjoyed your post. I think you captured Father's character perfectly as someone notably "left behind" by the rapid changes happening all around him. You strengthened this perspective with how his family is moving forward, but he remains mostly stagnant and struggling to catch up. The contrast between Mother and Father that you pointed out was also really strong and made his lack of growth very clear. Wonderful blog post!
ReplyDeleteI love your interpretation of the world changing around someone. I feel like it really captured the isolation and alienation Father felt upon his return from his expedition in the Arctic. Personally I wonder what we would find if we followed your advice and inspected Father's character more thoroughly. I especially wonder about a scene that I feel we kind of glossed over where Father describes a sexual interaction he had with a woman during his exploration. I think this speaks a lot to his prejudicial views and interesting relationship with Mother. Thank you for this post!
ReplyDeleteHey Zoe I really enjoyed your blog and agreed with all of it! As we were talking about Father in class I was also wondering about the alienation Father felt after his expeditions; how Father comes back to a household that has moved forward without him and feels "passed by life." I think you did a great job showing how that contrast between Father and Mother highlights the shift from the early 1900s traditional housewife roles to a more modern, independent, mindset. My favorite idea that you bring up in your blog was how you tied Coalhouse's presence into Father's fragile Masculinity. This point really shows how societal changes can make even people who think they're in control unsettled. Great Job!
ReplyDelete